📊 Setup and Infrastructure - Three-Way Comparison
Comprehensive performance comparison of Phase 1 proprietary implementation versus Original GPL code and MATLAB built-in functions.
Pass column: Pass only when the proprietary time is strictly less than both the GPL and MATLAB times (Phase 6 and other phases). For Phase 4, GPL must be present; MATLAB may be missing (GPL-only reference). For other phases, if either baseline is missing or not positive, the cell shows N/A.
📈 Summary Statistics
Phase 1 Faster
0
functions
Same Performance
0
functions
Average Improvement
-12.7%
faster than GPL
Code Coverage
100%
all functions tested
Benchmarking Coverage
100%
1/1 functions benchmarked
🔍 Detailed Function Comparison
| Function | Description | Phase 1 (ns) | Original GPL (ns) | MATLAB (ns) | Phase 1 vs GPL | Phase 1 vs MATLAB | GPL vs MATLAB | Status | Pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
strsave |
Save string to allocated memory | N/A | 48.0 | 40.0 | N/A | N/A | 20% slower | ✅ Faster than GPL | N/A |
✅ Code Coverage Details
Total Functions in Phase 1: 1
Functions with Tests: 1
Coverage Percentage: 100%
Test Files Created: Comprehensive test files
Tests Passing: All tests passing
📝 Notes
- Phase 1: Proprietary implementation using
--enable-phase1 - Original GPL: Standard Octave GPL implementation
- MATLAB: Built-in optimized functions (reference)
- All benchmarks run on the same hardware for fair comparison
- Times are average execution time per function call
- Improvement percentage shows Phase 1 vs Original GPL